Camp Manufacturing Co. v. Carpenter

70 S.E. 497, 112 Va. 79, 1911 Va. LEXIS 54
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedMarch 9, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 70 S.E. 497 (Camp Manufacturing Co. v. Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camp Manufacturing Co. v. Carpenter, 70 S.E. 497, 112 Va. 79, 1911 Va. LEXIS 54 (Va. 1911).

Opinion

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The facts of this case are as follows: The Camp Manufacturing Company is engaged in the business of buying standing timber and timber lands, and the manufac[80]*80ture of timber into lumber; and in order to carry on its business has erected and equipped three large lumber manufacturing plants, one of which is located at Franklin, on the Southern railway, in Isle of Wight county, one at Arringdale station, on the Southern railway, in Southampton county, and the third at Butterworth, on the Seaboard Air Line railway, in Dinwiddie county. In the conduct of its business it employs a large number of employees, teams, expensive machinery and appliances, and in order to make its business profitable it is necessary that it should acquire great bodies of standing timber, and build, equip and operate railroads for the purpose of hauling and transporting its timber and raw material from remote localities to its plants to be manufactured, and to incur large .pecu.niary obligations in order to provide the necessary means with which to conduct its business. For the purpose of acquiring standing timber in sufficient quantities to render its business successful and justify it in incurring the vast expenses aforesaid, it has lawfully and in good faith, from time to time, purchased large tracts of standing timber, separate from the land on which said timber is growing, and in many instances purchased tracts of timbered land in fee simple, until it has acquired large holdings of timber lands and standing timber, amounting to many millions of feet of timber and many thousands of acres of lands. A large part of the lands and timber thus acquired is in the county of Brunswick, on the Meherrin river, which flows from the west to the east, passing through about the center of the county.

John W. Harrison and wife owned a tract of 891% acres of land on the south side of the Meherrin river, and on the 18th day of May, 1899, they conveyed to the Brunswick Lumber Company, a corporation, all the timber, pine and poplar, ten inches in diameter across the stump and larger at the time of cutting, on this tract; the deed containing the [81]*81following covenant: That the parties of the first part (John W. Harrison and wife) “are seized of said timber in fee simple, that the same is free from all encumbrances whatever, that they will execute such further assurances as may be necessary to give a good and sufficient title to the said party of the second part for the said timber, and that said party of the second part shall quietly use, enjoy and occupy the same under this contract. It is agreed that the said party of the second part, its assigns or successors, shall have the right to erect such buildings on said land as they see fit, and to build, use and operate railroads, tramways, or bogy roads across the lands of the said parties of the first part for the purpose of removing said timber or anything else which they now, or may hereafter wish to carry over said railways, tramways, etc., and they may use such material from said land along said roads, tramways, etc., as may be necessary or convenient to build and maintain the same, and they shall have the right to remove the said buildings, railroads, tramways, etc., from said lands within one year after ceasing to operate, use or occupy said buildings, railroads, tramways, etc. The said party of the second part, its assigns or successors, shall have five years from the date of this deed in which to remove the timber herein conveyed from the said land, and if they fail to remove the said timber in said time, they may have such further time in which to remove the same as they may desire, provided, however, that they pay interest to the said parties of the first part, or their assigns, at the rate of six per cent, per annum on the amount of the purchase price above mentioned, from the expiration of the said five years until they remove the said timber. And the parties of the first part shall pay all levies, taxes, assessments and dues upon the said land or timber, until the said timber shall be removed.”

Harrison and wife executed a second deed to the Bruns[82]*82wick Lumber Company, on May 27, 1899, by which they conveyed all timber, oak, pine and poplar, ten inches in diameter across the stump and larger, at the time of cutting, on the land therein described, with covenants and reservations similar to those above set out, all of which appears from these deeds which are filed as exhibits with the bill.

On the 1st day of November, 1902, the Brunswick Lumber Company conveyed to the Camp Manufacturing Company, as its assignee, and successor, all of the timber property and rights granted to it by John W. Harrison and wife in the two deeds just mentioned, and these deeds were all duly recorded in the clerk’s office of Brunswick county.

On the 1st of January, 1903, Harrison and wife conveyed the 891% acres to George C. Dromgoole, who died leaving as his heirs at law Edward Dromgoole, a brother of the full blood, and John W. Harrison and Mary C. Epes, a brother and sister of the half blood; and by subsequent conveyances the title to the whole 891% acres, called the “Westward Farm,” vested in Mary C. Epes.

In the deed of the 1st of January, 1903, from John W. Harrison to George C. Dromgoole, there is a reservation by which all the timber on the land therein conveyed and all rights under the contracts of sale to the Brunswick Lumber Company, “whether of reversion of said timber or payments to be made by said company for any cause, and all other rights whatever,” are reserved to John W. Harrison and wife.

On the 30th of April, 1906, Mary C. Epes and her husband conveyed to W. R. Carpenter and George W. Pearson this tract of 891% acres.

" It appears that a controversy arose between Mrs. Epes and W. R. Carpenter with respect to the extent and value of the timber rights and interests reserved by John W. Harrison in this 891% acres of land, which resulted in a [83]*83suit in which Carpenter claimed an abatement of the purchase money which he had agreed to pay. This terminated in an agreement by which the purchase money agreed to be paid by Carpenter to Mrs. Epes was reduced by the sum of $ — :-, and Carpenter and his co-purchaser, Pearson, released Mrs. Epes from any and all liability to them or either of them on account of the timber rights held by the Camp Manufacturing Company as successors to the Brunswick Lumber Company or otherwise on the said tract of land.

The Camp Manufacturing Company, in the prosecution of its business, desired to build a railroad from a point on the Southern railway to the north of the Meherrin river across said stream to its holdings of timber to the south of that river at a point opposite the tract of 891*4 acres, and for this purpose it acquired rights of way from the intervening land owners, and its surveyor and agent went upon the 891*4 acres of land for the purpose of surveying and locating its line of railway. Carpenter was present on that occasion and aware of their purpose. It appears that the country to the east of said tract is rugged, and that a railway cannot be constructed through it without great expense; and Carpenter, it appears, suggested to the Camp Manufacturing Company’s agent a line for the railroad through the tract of 891*4 acres and through a tract owned by one Austin Phillips, through whose lands a right of way could be acquired without great expense, and pointed out in detail what was, in his judgment, the proper location for the road.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shirley v. Van Every
167 S.E. 345 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 S.E. 497, 112 Va. 79, 1911 Va. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camp-manufacturing-co-v-carpenter-va-1911.