Camoscio v. Diminoco
This text of Camoscio v. Diminoco (Camoscio v. Diminoco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 00-1310
FRANK CAMOSCIO,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
ROGER DEMINICO,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge, Boudin and Lipez, Circuit Judges.
Frank Camoscio on brief pro se. Michael A. Goldsmith, Assistant Corporation Counsel, and Merita A. Hopkins, Corporation Counsel, on Motion for Summary Disposition, for appellee.
December 5, 2000 Per Curiam. Having thoroughly reviewed the record
and the parties' submissions on appeal, we affirm the
dismissal of the appellant's complaint on the ground that it
is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Costs to
appellee. See Local Rule 27(c); Fed. R. App. P. 39(a)(2).
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Camoscio v. Diminoco, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camoscio-v-diminoco-ca1-2000.