Camoscio v. Commonwealth of Mass

Opinion

March 23, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 92-2386

FRANK J. CAMOSCIO,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AND

THE BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PODIATRY,

Defendants, Appellees.

__________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge ]

Before

Torruella, Cyr and Boudin

Circuit Judges .

Frank J. Camoscio on brief pro se.

Scott Harshbarger , Attorney General, and Beth D. Levi , Assistant Attorney General, on Memorandum in Support of the Motion for Summary Affirmance for appellees.

Per Curiam . We have reviewed the record in this case and are persuaded that this action, the appellant's third against the defendant Board of Registration in Podiatry, is frivolous, vexatious, and barred by res judicata , the Rooker doctrine, and the statute of limitations. See Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. Street v. Vose , 936 F.2d 38 (1st Cir. 1991)(per curiam). Accordingly, the appellees' motion for summary disposition is allowed and the judgment dismissing the instant complaint is affirmed. We further affirm the district court's order enjoining the appellant from filing any further actions without either obtaining leave of court or the aid and signature of counsel.