Camofi Master LDC v. ComVest Group

103 A.D.3d 566, 959 N.Y.S.2d 443

This text of 103 A.D.3d 566 (Camofi Master LDC v. ComVest Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camofi Master LDC v. ComVest Group, 103 A.D.3d 566, 959 N.Y.S.2d 443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered on or about June 19, 2012, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the partial stay granted on defendants’ prior motion to compel arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Vacatur of the partial stay was a provident exercise of discretion in light of the timely amendment of the complaint as of [567]*567right (see CPLR 3025 [a]) and the discontinuance of the arbitrable claims against the signatory to the agreement containing the arbitration clause. We reject defendants’ present attempt to raise arguments against vacatur with respect to non-signatories and certain claims that it had previously failed to advance. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Freedman, Richter and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A.D.3d 566, 959 N.Y.S.2d 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camofi-master-ldc-v-comvest-group-nyappdiv-2013.