Cammon v. Brigano

802 N.E.2d 656, 101 Ohio St. 3d 133
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 11, 2004
DocketNo. 2003-1520
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 802 N.E.2d 656 (Cammon v. Brigano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cammon v. Brigano, 802 N.E.2d 656, 101 Ohio St. 3d 133 (Ohio 2004).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} In November 2000, appellant, Donte Lamont Cammon, was convicted of four counts of aggravated robbery, two counts of felonious assault, and various specifications, and was sentenced to prison.

{¶ 2} In April 2003, Cammon filed a petition in the Court of Appeals for Warren County for a writ of habeas corpus to compel appellee, Lebanon Correctional Institution Warden Anthony Brigano, to release him from prison. Cammon claimed that he was entitled to the writ because of (1) defective jury verdict forms, (2) a judgment entry of conviction that had an unsigned second page, (3) improper jury instructions, (4) a racially discriminatory jury-selection process, (5) the erroneous admission of “other acts” evidence, and (6) a double-jeopardy violation based on the imposition of multiple sentences for the same conduct. Brigano moved to dismiss Cammon’s petition.

{¶ 3} On August 6, 2003, the court of appeals granted Brigano’s motion and dismissed the petition.

{¶ 4} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Cammon’s claims are not cognizable in habeas corpus. See Smith v. Mitchell (1998), 80 Ohio St.3d 624, 625, 687 N.E.2d 749 (jury instructions and verdict forms); In re Coleman, 95 Ohio St.3d 284, 2002-Ohio-1804, 767 N.E.2d 677, ¶ 3-4 (discrimination in jury selection); Davie v. Edwards (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 170, 170-171, 685 N.E.2d 228 (admissibility of evidence); Thomas v. Huffman (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 266, 267, 703 N.E.2d 315 (double jeopardy); Howard v. Randle, 95 Ohio St.3d 281, 2002-Ohio-2122, 767 N.E.2d 268, ¶ 6 (sentencing errors). Moreover, nothing in Crim.R. 32(C) requires a trial court judge to sign all pages of a multiple-page judgment entry.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Donte Lamont Cammon, pro se. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Gregory T. Hartke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Payne v. LaRose
2020 Ohio 5460 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
Wilson v. Hudson
2010 Ohio 4990 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Johnson v. Bobby
103 Ohio St. 3d 96 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
802 N.E.2d 656, 101 Ohio St. 3d 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cammon-v-brigano-ohio-2004.