Cammill v. Americian Creosote Works, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Cammill v. Americian Creosote Works, Inc.

120 So. 551, 9 La. App. 291, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 682

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided December 19, 1928·No. No. 3259·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

When this case was ■ reached for argument, counsel, on both sides, stated in open court that an agreement had been reached that a lump sum should be paid by defendant in settlement of the demands of plaintiff.

This court having no jurisdiction to grant judgment ordering lump sum settle-, ment, it is therefore ordered that the .case: be remanded to the lower court in order. that that court may take the necessary ■ steps with reference to such lump sum settlement as may be agreed upon by the; ¡parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

When this case was ■ reached for argument, counsel, on both sides, stated in open court that an agreement had been reached that a lump sum should be paid by defendant in settlement of the demands of plaintiff.

This court having no jurisdiction to grant judgment ordering lump sum settle-, ment, it is therefore ordered that the .case: be remanded to the lower court in order. that that court may take the necessary ■ steps with reference to such lump sum settlement as may be agreed upon by the; ¡parties.

Cammill v. Americian Creosote Works, Inc., 120 So. 551, 9 La. App. 291, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 682 (La. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

120 So. 551 (Cammill v. Americian Creosote Works, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related