Cammill v. Americian Creosote Works, Inc.

120 So. 551, 9 La. App. 291, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 682
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 19, 1928
DocketNo. 3259
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 So. 551 (Cammill v. Americian Creosote Works, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cammill v. Americian Creosote Works, Inc., 120 So. 551, 9 La. App. 291, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 682 (La. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

When this case was ■ reached for argument, counsel, on both sides, stated in open court that an agreement had been reached that a lump sum should be paid by defendant in settlement of the demands of plaintiff.

This court having no jurisdiction to grant judgment ordering lump sum settle-, ment, it is therefore ordered that the .case: be remanded to the lower court in order. that that court may take the necessary ■ steps with reference to such lump sum settlement as may be agreed upon by the; ¡parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Treuil v. National District Telegraph Co. of Louisiana
150 So. 312 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 So. 551, 9 La. App. 291, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cammill-v-americian-creosote-works-inc-lactapp-1928.