Cammarota v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF TRUMBULL

912 A.2d 475, 280 Conn. 941
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 16, 2006
StatusPublished

This text of 912 A.2d 475 (Cammarota v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF TRUMBULL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cammarota v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF TRUMBULL, 912 A.2d 475, 280 Conn. 941 (Colo. 2006).

Opinion

912 A.2d 475 (2006)
280 Conn. 941

Luigi CAMMAROTA et al.
v.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF the TOWN OF TRUMBULL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided November 16, 2006.

Joseph A. Kubic, Milford, in support of the petition.

The petition by the plaintiffs, Luigi Cammarota and Lynn Cammarota, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 97 Conn.App. 783, 906 A.2d 741 (2006), is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cammarota v. Planning & Zoning Commission
906 A.2d 741 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
912 A.2d 475, 280 Conn. 941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cammarota-v-planning-and-zoning-commission-of-the-town-of-trumbull-conn-2006.