Camman v. Doughty

84 A. 270, 79 N.J. Eq. 650, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 327
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedMarch 4, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 84 A. 270 (Camman v. Doughty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camman v. Doughty, 84 A. 270, 79 N.J. Eq. 650, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 327 (N.J. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed for the reasons-stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Ordinary Walker.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard; Parker, Voorhees, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, VrbdenBURGH, CONGDON, WHITE, TREACY—12. For reversal—Bergen, Vroom—2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 A. 270, 79 N.J. Eq. 650, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camman-v-doughty-njch-1912.