Cammack v. Blaine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cammack v. Blaine

259 A.D. 999, 21 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7668

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 14, 1940·Published

Opinion

'Order unanimously modified by inserting in the last paragraph thereof, after “ are not discontinued,” the words “ or otherwise finally disposed of,” and by adding at the end of the paragraph the following: “ without prejudice to an application by plaintiff for leave to intervene in the Leech or Mintzer action,” and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

'Order unanimously modified by inserting in the last paragraph thereof, after “ are not discontinued,” the words “ or otherwise finally disposed of,” and by adding at the end of the paragraph the following: “ without prejudice to an application by plaintiff for leave to intervene in the Leech or Mintzer action,” and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Cammack v. Blaine, 259 A.D. 999, 21 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 999 (Cammack v. Blaine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.