CAMINIS v. Troy

Supreme Court of Connecticut

CAMINIS v. Troy

969 A.2d 171, 291 Conn. 909, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 176

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedApril 8, 2009

DocketSC 18335

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 969 A.2d 171 (CAMINIS v. Troy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

CAMINIS v. Troy, 969 A.2d 171, 291 Conn. 909, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 176 (Colo. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 112 Conn. App. 546 (AC 28955), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court erred in rendering a judgment declaring the littoral boundary of the plaintiffs’ property?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court correctly denied the plaintiffs’ request for an injunction?”

ROGERS, C. J., and McLACHLAN, J.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI