Caminez v. Sussman Bros.

138 A.D. 920, 123 N.Y.S. 1109

This text of 138 A.D. 920 (Caminez v. Sussman Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caminez v. Sussman Bros., 138 A.D. 920, 123 N.Y.S. 1109 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the answer raises an issue as to -the presentation and notice of dishonor of the check in suit, and judgment upon the pleadings should not have been directed. (Cassel v. Regierer, 114 N. Y. Supp. 601.) The failure to obtain an order directing the issues to be tried was waived by the plaintiff. (Tautphoeus v. Harbor & Suburban Assn., 96 App. Div. 23; Blenderman v. Bellis Co., 64 Misc. Rep. 65.) The appeal from the order denying the motion1 to set aside, the judgment is dismissed, without costs. Jenks, Burr, Thomas, Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tautphoeus v. Harbor & Suburban Building & Savings Ass'n
96 A.D. 23 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Blenderman v. J. R. Bellis Co.
64 Misc. 65 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Cassel v. Regierer
114 N.Y.S. 601 (New York Supreme Court, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A.D. 920, 123 N.Y.S. 1109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caminez-v-sussman-bros-nyappdiv-1910.