Caminez v. Sussman Bros.
This text of 138 A.D. 920 (Caminez v. Sussman Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the answer raises an issue as to -the presentation and notice of dishonor of the check in suit, and judgment upon the pleadings should not have been directed. (Cassel v. Regierer, 114 N. Y. Supp. 601.) The failure to obtain an order directing the issues to be tried was waived by the plaintiff. (Tautphoeus v. Harbor & Suburban Assn., 96 App. Div. 23; Blenderman v. Bellis Co., 64 Misc. Rep. 65.) The appeal from the order denying the motion1 to set aside, the judgment is dismissed, without costs. Jenks, Burr, Thomas, Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
138 A.D. 920, 123 N.Y.S. 1109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caminez-v-sussman-bros-nyappdiv-1910.