Caminetti v. Superior Court

108 P.2d 919, 16 Cal. 2d 853, 1941 Cal. LEXIS 240
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Caminetti v. Superior Court. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 Cal. 2d 838
California Supreme Court·Decided January 6, 1941·No. L. A. No. 17727·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

The facts and issues presented in this proceeding together with such additional observations as appear in Caminetti v. Superior Court, S. F. 16476 (ante, p. 850 [108 Pac. (2d) 918]), this day filed, are substantially similar to those presented in Caminetti v. Superior Court, S. F. 16479 (ante, p. 838 [108 Pac. (2d) 911]), this day decided. For the reasons advanced in and upon the authority of the last cited case, let peremptory writs of prohibition and mandate issue respectively restraining the respondent Superior Court from taking any further steps or proceedings in the conservatorship proceeding pending therein, and directing it to transfer the same to the Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles.

Gibson, C. J., did not participate in the decision.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caminetti v. Superior Court, 108 P.2d 919, 16 Cal. 2d 853, 1941 Cal. LEXIS 240 (Cal. 1941).

108 P.2d 919 (Caminetti v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caminetti v. Superior Court
108 P.2d 911 (California Supreme Court, 1941)
Caminetti v. Superior Court
108 P.2d 918 (California Supreme Court, 1941)