Camina v. Parliament Ins. Co.

417 So. 2d 1093
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 10, 1982
Docket81-2751
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 417 So. 2d 1093 (Camina v. Parliament Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camina v. Parliament Ins. Co., 417 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

417 So.2d 1093 (1982)

Mary CAMINA and Leo Camina, Her Husband, Appellants,
v.
PARLIAMENT INSURANCE COMPANY, a Floreign Corporation, and Classic Fashions, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

No. 81-2751.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 10, 1982.

*1094 Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Brumer, Cohen, Logan & Kandell, Miami, for appellants.

Underwood, Gillis, Karcher, Reinert & Valle and Stephen E. Tunstall, Miami, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court's order directing a verdict for the defendant upon a holding that notwithstanding the plaintiff's inability to elicit direct testimony as to the length of time that the thawed ice cream upon which she slipped and fell had been on the floor of the entranceway to the defendant's store, an area which a storekeeper has a duty to maintain with the exercise of ordinary and reasonable care, Burmeister v. American Motorists Insurance Co., 403 So.2d 541 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); circumstantial evidence is sufficient to show that a dangerous condition existed for such a length of time so as to charge the storeowner with constructive notice, Schmidt v. Bowl American Florida, Inc., 358 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Williams, 264 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); and the evidence here that, inter alia, the ice cream was thawed, dirty and splattered, although susceptible of the inference that the plaintiff's slip and fall had created the condition, was equally susceptible of the inference that the condition existed beforehand, Montgomery v. Florida Jitney Jungle Stores, Inc., 281 So.2d 302 (Fla. 1973); Burmeister v. American Motorists Insurance Co., supra; Grizzard v. Colonial Stores, Inc., 330 So.2d 768 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Lee v. Southland Corporation, 253 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971), so as to make the issue of the defendant's constructive notice of the condition one to be resolved by a jury, Montgomery v. Florida Jitney Jungle Stores, Inc., supra.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vanessa Sutton v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
64 F.4th 1166 (Eleventh Circuit, 2023)
Wilson-Greene v. City of Miami
208 So. 3d 1271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Grimes v. Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc.
194 So. 3d 424 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Mashni v. LaSalle Partners Management Ltd.
842 So. 2d 1035 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Owens v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
802 So. 2d 315 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Soriano v. B & B Cash Grocery Stores, Inc.
757 So. 2d 514 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Pittman
656 So. 2d 632 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Newalk v. Florida Supermarkets, Inc.
610 So. 2d 528 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Ayers v. City of Miami
578 So. 2d 302 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Benton
576 So. 2d 359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Broz v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
546 So. 2d 83 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Teate v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
524 So. 2d 1060 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Perdomo v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
497 So. 2d 1324 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Evens v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
468 So. 2d 1111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Bryant v. Linea Manaure, C.A.
467 So. 2d 795 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Washington v. PIC-N-PAY SUPERMARKET
453 So. 2d 508 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Nance v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.
436 So. 2d 1075 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
417 So. 2d 1093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camina-v-parliament-ins-co-fladistctapp-1982.