Camilo v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
This text of Camilo v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Camilo v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
RUFINA O. CAMILO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-0641 (RC) ) ) COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL ) SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al., ) ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, ECF
No. 4. On June 11, 2015, plaintiff Rufina O. Camilo was ordered to respond to the motion by
July 20, 2015, or risk summary dismissal of the case. See Order, ECF No. 6. Ms. Camilo has
not complied with the order and has not sought additional time to do so. Hence this case will be
dismissed on what is considered to be a conceded motion to dismiss. See Twelve John Does v.
District of Columbia, 117 F.3d 571, 577 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (“Where the district court relies on the
absence of a response as a basis for treating a motion as conceded, [the District of Columbia
Circuit] honor[s] its enforcement” of the local rule.); accord Fox v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d
1291, 1294-95 (D.C. Cir. 2004); FDIC v. Bender, 127 F.3d 58, 67-68 (D.C. Cir. 1997). A
separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
________/s/____________ RUDOLPH CONTRERAS United States District Judge Date: August 19, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Camilo v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camilo-v-commissioner-social-security-administrati-dcd-2015.