Camilletti v. Attorney General

17 Ct. Cl. 173
West Virginia Court of Claims·Decided February 3, 1989·No. CC-89-18·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent Answer.

[174] Claimant brought this action to recover reimbursement for services rendered as a Special Assistant Attorney General. Claimant was appointed by respondent to assist the Prosecuting Attorney for Marshall County in the prosecution of inmates for the prison uprising which occurred during the period of January 1 through January 3, 1986. Claimant alleges a balance due and owing in the amount of $5,600.50. The invoice of these services was not processed for payment in the proper fiscal year.

Respondent filed an Answer stating that this claim is valid and that the amount is fair and reasonable for the services rendered. Respondent also stated that there were sufficient funds available within the proper fiscal year with which the claim could have been paid.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award to the claimant in the amount sought.

Award of $5,600.50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Camilletti v. Attorney General, 17 Ct. Cl. 173 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1989).

17 Ct. Cl. 173 (Camilletti v. Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commissioner v. Swift
54 F.2d 746 (Ninth Circuit, 1932)