Camille v. State

803 So. 2d 910, 2002 WL 27258
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 11, 2002
Docket2D01-4733
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 803 So. 2d 910 (Camille v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camille v. State, 803 So. 2d 910, 2002 WL 27258 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

803 So.2d 910 (2002)

Emilea CAMILLE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D01-4733.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 11, 2002.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court's denial of Camille's motion for postconviction relief because he filed his motion outside the two-year window that closed May 27, 2001, within which to file claims traditionally cognizable under coram nobis. See Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592, 595 (1999).

ALTENBERND and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JAMES JASON RIANI v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
JAMIE WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
Harrell v. State
141 So. 3d 630 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
McClendon v. State
861 So. 2d 1213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
803 So. 2d 910, 2002 WL 27258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camille-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.