Camille v. State
803 So. 2d 910, 2002 WL 27258
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 11, 2002·No. 2D01-4733·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Emilea CAMILLE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the circuit court's denial of Camille's motion for postconviction relief because he filed his motion outside the two-year window that closed May 27, 2001, within which to file claims traditionally cognizable under coram nobis. See Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592, 595 (1999).
ALTENBERND and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Camille v. State, 803 So. 2d 910, 2002 WL 27258 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
803 So. 2d 910 (Camille v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
JAMES JASON RIANI v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
JAMIE WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
Harrell v. State
141 So. 3d 630 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
McClendon v. State
861 So. 2d 1213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)