Camille v. Couch

40 F. 176, 1889 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina
DecidedOctober 22, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 40 F. 176 (Camille v. Couch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camille v. Couch, 40 F. 176, 1889 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182 (southcarolinaed 1889).

Opinion

Simonton, J.

The libel is for personal injuries inflicted by the master of the steam-ship Resolven on libelant on the high seas off the Canary islands. Libelant shipped at Cardiff, Wales, on British steam-ship Re-solven, signing the articles as a resident of the isle of Malta. His engagement was for one year, and the steamer was bound for the port of Charleston.. Reaching this port, the libelant sought the French consul, alleging that he was a French citizen, and asking his good offices in obtaining a release from the shipping articles. The French consul saw her British majesty’s consul, and, after some discussion and negotiation, libelant obtained his discharge, received the balance due him for wages to this port, and released the ship. The steamer is about to put to sea to-day. The libel was filed this morning, and the respondent was arrested. The action is between foreigners. The cause of action was on the high seas on a foreign vessel. The cause, however, is within the jurisdiction of this court, (The Belgenland, 114 U. S. 362, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 860,) if it chooses to take jurisdiction. The relations of libelant to this ship were settled by his own consul with the consul of the respondent. These gentlemen discussed these relations when they made the settlement. Under all the circumstances I will not interfere. Dismiss the libel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.
285 U.S. 413 (Supreme Court, 1932)
The Ester
190 F. 216 (E.D. South Carolina, 1911)
The Baker
157 F. 485 (E.D. New York, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 F. 176, 1889 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camille-v-couch-southcarolinaed-1889.