Camiano v. Rifkin

77 F. Supp. 363, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2681
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMarch 11, 1948
StatusPublished

This text of 77 F. Supp. 363 (Camiano v. Rifkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camiano v. Rifkin, 77 F. Supp. 363, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2681 (S.D.N.Y. 1948).

Opinion

BONDY, District Judge.

This is an action to recover unpaid overtime compensation and liquidated damages pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216 (b). Plaintiffs .are employed by defendant in connection with its business of providing transportation services and facilities in connection with the garment industry.

The pleadings, depositions and affidavits present genuine questions of fact as to the character of plaintiffs’ duties and extent of plaintiffs’ activities. Only by the trial can it be determined whether any of plaintiffs’ duties and activities in defendant’s business affect safety of op[364]*364eration of motor vehicles in such manner as to subject plaintiffs to the jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce Commission under Section 204(a) of the Motor Carrier Act of 1935, 49 U.S.C.A. § 304(a), and to exclude them from any benefits of Section 7 by Section 13(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of .1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 207, 213(b). United States v. American Trucking Ass’ns, 310 U.S. 534, 60 S.Ct. 1059, 84 L.Ed. 1345; Levinson v. Spector Motor Co., 330 U.S. 649, 67 S.Ct. 931; Pyramid Motor Freight Corporation v. Ispass, 330 U.S. 695, 67 S.Ct. 954; Morris v. McComb, 332 U.S. 422, 68 S.Ct. 131; Walling v. Comet Carriers, 2 Cir., 151 F.2d 107, certiorari dismissed 328 U.S. 819, 66 S.Ct. 1007, 90 L.Ed. 1600.

Defendant’s defenses under Sections 9 and 11 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 258, 260, must be tried since his good faith has been made a question of fact by the affidavits.

Plaintiffs are not barred from obtaining relief because they did not make or can not produce accurate records of time worked by them. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 687, 66 S.Ct. 1187, 90 L.Ed. 1515.

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment accordingly must be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. American Trucking Associations
310 U.S. 534 (Supreme Court, 1940)
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
328 U.S. 680 (Supreme Court, 1946)
Levinson v. Spector Motor Service
330 U.S. 649 (Supreme Court, 1947)
Pyramid Motor Freight Corp. v. Ispass
330 U.S. 695 (Supreme Court, 1947)
Morris v. McComb
332 U.S. 422 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Walling v. Comet Carriers, Inc.
151 F.2d 107 (Second Circuit, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 F. Supp. 363, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camiano-v-rifkin-nysd-1948.