Camet v. McDonald's Corp.
This text of 694 So. 2d 225 (Camet v. McDonald's Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re St. Angelo, Rodney; Act One Co.;— Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, mandamus, supervisory and/or review; Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 77-349; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 97CA-0328.
Granted. Judgment of the trial court is reversed and set aside for the reasons assigned in the dissenting opinion of Judge Byrnes. Summary judgment is granted in favor of relators dismissing plaintiffs’ suit against them with prejudice. Case remanded to the trial court for farther proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
694 So. 2d 225, 1997 La. LEXIS 1790, 1997 WL 294564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camet-v-mcdonalds-corp-la-1997.