Camerron v. State

508 So. 2d 570, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1537, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9006
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 1987·No. No. 86-2388·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes error in the trial court’s inclusion of victim injury points in scoring the robbery conviction when physical contact does not constitute an element of the crime. Vaillant v. State, 490 So.2d 1326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.7. See also Byrd v. State, 503 So.2d 434 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (victim injury may not be scored because not element of robbery); Vega v. State, 498 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986) (same); Ritts v. State, 491 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (same); Wright v. State, 487 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (victim injury not a necessary element of armed robbery). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit. Phillips v. State, 476 So.2d 194 (Fla.1985).

Conviction affirmed, sentence vacated, and remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Camerron v. State, 508 So. 2d 570, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1537, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9006 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

508 So. 2d 570 (Camerron v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilcher v. State
524 So. 2d 1105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)