Cameron v. Todd Hotel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cameron v. Todd Hotel Corp.

55 A.D.2d 519, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15154

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 519 (Cameron v. Todd Hotel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cameron v. Todd Hotel Corp., 55 A.D.2d 519, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 8, 1976, in favor of defendant after a jury trial, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In denying plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict the trial court stated that the issues had been submitted to the jury for determination and he saw no reason to disturb the verdict. We agree. We find no prejudicial error in the admission of evidence, or in the court’s charge. Nor is the verdict against the weight of the credible evidence. Plaintiff has failed to show that "it plainly appears that the evidence so preponderates in favor of the plaintiff that the verdict for the defendant could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence.” (Marton v McCasland, 16 AD2d 781, 782.) Concur—Markewich, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 8, 1976, in favor of defendant after a jury trial, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In denying plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict the trial court stated that the issues had been submitted to the jury for determination and he saw no reason to disturb the verdict. We agree. We find no prejudicial error in the admission of evidence, or in the court’s charge. Nor is the verdict against the weight of the credible evidence. Plaintiff has failed to show that "it plainly appears that the evidence so preponderates in favor of the plaintiff that the verdict for the defendant could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence.” (Marton v McCasland, 16 AD2d 781, 782.) Concur—Markewich, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 519, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-v-todd-hotel-corp-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack