Cameron v. State
This text of 79 S.E. 745 (Cameron v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The written request .to charge was pertinent and material to the contention of the accused. The entire charge is not in the record, but the trial judge in his order overruling the motion for a new trial states that he submitted to the jury the contentions of the accused embraced in the written request, and incorporated in his order the substance of his instructions on the contentions covered by the request, and an examination of these instructions shows that they clearly covered the -substance of the written request.
2. No other error of law except' as above stated being complained of, and, the verdict being supported by evidence, the judgment must be Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 S.E. 745, 13 Ga. App. 660, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-v-state-gactapp-1913.