Cameron v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cameron v. State

267 So. 2d 693, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6187

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 1972·No. No. 71-189·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of possession of marijuana. The trial court entered judgment of conviction, and defendant appealed.

[694] The record on appeal and the briefs of the parties have been read and given full consideration. It appears to the court that the only question raised by appellant which warrants consideration is point two. This point must be resolved against the defendant on authority of Lashley v. State, Fla. 1953, 67 So.2d 648. The question of entrapment was for the jury to decide. The jury resolved the matter adversely to the defendant and found him guilty. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., and BEASLEY, THOMAS D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of possession of marijuana. The trial court entered judgment of conviction, and defendant appealed.

[694] The record on appeal and the briefs of the parties have been read and given full consideration. It appears to the court that the only question raised by appellant which warrants consideration is point two. This point must be resolved against the defendant on authority of Lashley v. State, Fla. 1953, 67 So.2d 648. The question of entrapment was for the jury to decide. The jury resolved the matter adversely to the defendant and found him guilty. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., and BEASLEY, THOMAS D., Associate Judge, concur.

Cameron v. State, 267 So. 2d 693, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6187 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

267 So. 2d 693 (Cameron v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related