Cameron v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Cameron v. State

191 So. 34, 140 Fla. 52, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1048

DecidedSeptember 15, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 191 So. 34 (Cameron v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cameron v. State, 191 So. 34, 140 Fla. 52, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1048 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

Writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the crime of grand larceny.

The chief challenge of the plaintiffs in error is to the sufficiency of the evidence.

We have carefully perused the evidence as reflected by the bill of exceptions and find it entirely ample to support the verdict and judgment.

Other contentions have been fully considered in connection with the record and on the whole record no reversible error is made to appear.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI