Cameron v. Noonan

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided March 7, 1997·No. 96-1862·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion



[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________

No. 96-1862

ROBERT E. CAMERON,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

JOHN NOONAN, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Boudin and Lynch,
Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Scott Harshbarger, Attorney General, and Elisabeth J. Medvedow, __________________ ______________________
Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.

____________________

March 5, 1997
____________________

Per Curiam. After carefully reviewing the record, __________

we affirm the judgment of the district court for essentially ______

the reasons stated in its Memorandum and Order, dated June

20, 1996. See Local Rule 27.1. Appellant Robert E. ___

Cameron's motions for speedy consideration and the

appointment of counsel are denied. ______

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cameron v. Noonan, (1st Cir. 1997).

Cameron v. Noonan (Cameron v. Noonan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.