Cameron v. New Hanover Memorial Hosp., Inc.
This text of 297 S.E.2d 399 (Cameron v. New Hanover Memorial Hosp., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Donald J. CAMERON, D.P.M., N.F. Costin, D.P.M., and Podiatry Associates of Wilmington, P.A.
v.
NEW HANOVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter, Greensboro, for plaintiffs.
Ward & Smith, New Bern, for hospital.
Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, Raleigh, for Dineen and Thomas.
Plaintiffs' notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 731, 58 N.C.App. 414, 293 S.E.2d 901. Defendants' motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed. Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
297 S.E.2d 399, 307 N.C. 127, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-v-new-hanover-memorial-hosp-inc-nc-1982.