Cameron v. Miller

243 A.D. 652

This text of 243 A.D. 652 (Cameron v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cameron v. Miller, 243 A.D. 652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from judgments of the Albany County Court, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from orders denying motions for new trial. Defendant operated a taxicab business. His employee, in charge of the office, took charge of a taxicab, and in the operation thereof the accident resulted. The question was whether defendant’s employee was acting within the scope of his employment. The plaintiff claimed that an emergency arose justifying the employee (who had charge of the office) in the interests of his employer to operate defendant’s taxicab to an extent which permitted its being turned about, faced in the proper direction on the street. Judgments and orders unanimously affirmed, with costs in one action. Present ’— Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-v-miller-nyappdiv-1935.