Cameron v. MERISEL PROPERTIES
659 S.E.2d 438
This text of 659 S.E.2d 438 (Cameron v. MERISEL PROPERTIES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cameron v. MERISEL PROPERTIES, 659 S.E.2d 438 (N.C. 2008).
Opinion
CAMERON
v.
MERISEL PROPERTIES, et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jaye E. Bingham, Raleigh, for Merisel Properties.
Steven B. Epstein, John D. Burns, Raleigh, for Cameron.
Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 652 S.E.2d 660.
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of January 2008 by Defendant to Withdraw Petition for Discretionary Review:
"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of March 2008."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cameron v. Merisel Properties, Inc.
652 S.E.2d 660 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
659 S.E.2d 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-v-merisel-properties-nc-2008.