Cameron v. Griesa

87 P. 679, 74 Kan. 560, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 102
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedNovember 10, 1906
DocketNo. 14,632
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 87 P. 679 (Cameron v. Griesa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cameron v. Griesa, 87 P. 679, 74 Kan. 560, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 102 (kan 1906).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

An execution was levied upon land belonging to Hugh Cameron, who brought a suit seeking to enjoin its sale upon the ground that it was exempt because it was his homestead. He was denied relief, and prosecutes error. Whether the property was exempt was a question of fact, which was heard and determined upon conflicting oral testimony. The finding made by the trial court did not lack support in the evidence and is not subject to review here.

[561]*561The injunction was asked upon the further ground that the sheriff’s notice of sale was defective in that it failed to specify the county or state in which the property to be sold was situated. If the description was in fact insufficient the defect was a mere irregularity, for which the defendant had ample remedy in the ordinary course of procedure by objection to the confirmation of the sale. In such a case injunction does not lie. (16 A. & E, Encycl. of L. 403-405; 3 Freeman, Executions, 3d ed., § 436.) The judgment is affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Concordia Oil & Gas Co. v. Keenan
153 So. 549 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 P. 679, 74 Kan. 560, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-v-griesa-kan-1906.