Cameron v. Escofil

468 A.2d 513, 321 Pa. Super. 347, 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4367
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 25, 1983·No. No. 313·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County granting the appellant in forma pauperis status. Such an order is interlocutory, and not appealable as of right under Pa.R.A.P. 311. Moreover, appellant has not sought permission to appeal this order under Pa.R.A.P. 312. Finally, appellant’s Notice of Appeal was filed more than thirty (30) days after the entry of the trial court’s order, in violation of Pa.R.A.P. 903. As such this appeal must be quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cameron v. Escofil, 468 A.2d 513, 321 Pa. Super. 347, 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4367 (Pa. Ct. App. 1983).

468 A.2d 513 (Cameron v. Escofil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D.L. Smith v. Ivy League Real Estate, LLC
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2024
Dellaposta v. Packaging, Appeal of: Packaging
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
Robinson v. Trenton Dressed Poultry Co.
496 A.2d 1240 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)