Cameron v. Canieo
4 F. Cas. 1128, 9 Nat. Bank. Reg. 527
Opinion
I cannot see upon what ground this court can claim jurisdiction in this cause. The evidence is clear that their place of business is in Michigan, and has been there exclusively for the past eight years; that they have had no place of business in the southern district of Ohio; the members composing the firm reside in three different states, and the only court having jurisdiction of the case would be the district court of Michigan. Petition dismissed at cost of petitioner.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cameron v. Canieo, 4 F. Cas. 1128, 9 Nat. Bank. Reg. 527 (S.D. Ohio 1874).
4 F. Cas. 1128 (Cameron v. Canieo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Blair
99 F. 76 (S.D. New York, 1900)