Cameron v. Canieo

S.D. Ohio

Cameron v. Canieo

4 F. Cas. 1128, 9 Nat. Bank. Reg. 527

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio

DecidedJuly 1, 1874

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 F. Cas. 1128 (Cameron v. Canieo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cameron v. Canieo, 4 F. Cas. 1128, 9 Nat. Bank. Reg. 527 (S.D. Ohio 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

SWING, District Judge.

I cannot see upon what ground this court can claim jurisdiction in this cause. The evidence is clear that their place of business is in Michigan, and has been there exclusively for the past eight years; that they have had no place of business in the southern district of Ohio; the members composing the firm reside in three different states, and the only court having jurisdiction of the case would be the district court of Michigan. Petition dismissed at cost of petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SWING, District Judge.

I cannot see upon what ground this court can claim jurisdiction in this cause. The evidence is clear that their place of business is in Michigan, and has been there exclusively for the past eight years; that they have had no place of business in the southern district of Ohio; the members composing the firm reside in three different states, and the only court having jurisdiction of the case would be the district court of Michigan. Petition dismissed at cost of petitioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 F. Cas. 1128, 9 Nat. Bank. Reg. 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-v-canieo-ohsd-1874.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack