Cameron v. Cameron

29 N.E.2d 843, 307 Mass. 609, 1940 Mass. LEXIS 1030
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 1, 1940·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

This petition was brought in the Superior Court for the modification of a decree of divorce by providing therein for an award of alimony to the petitioner, the libellant in the divorce action. It was brought after the death of the libellee, whose administrator de bonis non was summoned to answer. Proceedings resulting in an interlocutory decree and in a final decree dismissing the petition need not be recited. From each of these decrees the petitioner appealed. There was no error. The petition cannot be maintained since there is no nonstatutory right to alimony, and the statutes relating thereto “com template proceedings . . . between living parties and the making of orders to operate prospectively in accordance with the existing financial condition of the parties . . . [and] do not justify orders or judgments made after the death of a necessary party, operating retroactively.” Gediman v. Cameron, 306 Mass. 138, 140-141.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cameron v. Cameron, 29 N.E.2d 843, 307 Mass. 609, 1940 Mass. LEXIS 1030 (Mass. 1940).

29 N.E.2d 843 (Cameron v. Cameron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Barba
640 N.E.2d 476 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1994)
Barron v. Puzo
610 N.E.2d 973 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1993)
DuMont v. Godbey
415 N.E.2d 188 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1981)