Cameron v. Cameron

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cameron v. Cameron

145 So. 3d 986, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13455, 2014 WL 4249750

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 29, 2014

DocketNo. 5D13-3723

StatusPublished

This text of 145 So. 3d 986 (Cameron v. Cameron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cameron v. Cameron, 145 So. 3d 986, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13455, 2014 WL 4249750 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cori Cameron (“Wife”) appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. She contends that the trial court erred in its child support calculations by including in Wife’s gross income amounts that the employer contributed to her health insurance costs without subtracting a corre[987]*987sponding amount in determining her net income. Christopher Cameron (“Husband”) concedes error.

Wife also argues that the final judgment did not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement regarding the responsibility for daycare expenses incurred after the child began voluntary prekindergarten in August 2013. The trial court orally pronounced that these expenses would be shared in the same percentage(s) utilized for the purpose of calculating child support.¹ However, the final judgment imposed the obligation to pay these expenses entirely upon Wife. Husband again concedes error.²

On remand, after redetermining Wife’s net income, the trial court is directed to recalculate child support, child support ar-rearages, and each party’s respective share for child care expenses.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Cori Cameron (“Wife”) appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. She contends that the trial court erred in its child support calculations by including in Wife’s gross income amounts that the employer contributed to her health insurance costs without subtracting a corre[987]*987sponding amount in determining her net income. Christopher Cameron (“Husband”) concedes error.

Wife also argues that the final judgment did not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement regarding the responsibility for daycare expenses incurred after the child began voluntary prekindergarten in August 2013. The trial court orally pronounced that these expenses would be shared in the same percentage(s) utilized for the purpose of calculating child support.¹ However, the final judgment imposed the obligation to pay these expenses entirely upon Wife. Husband again concedes error.²

On remand, after redetermining Wife’s net income, the trial court is directed to recalculate child support, child support ar-rearages, and each party’s respective share for child care expenses.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 So. 3d 986, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13455, 2014 WL 4249750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-v-cameron-fladistctapp-2014.