Cameron v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.
This text of 195 A.D.2d 991 (Cameron v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff was injured while operating a printing machine allegedly manufactured by the Western Gear Corporation. Defendants Bucyrus-Erie Company and Lucas Industries, Inc., contend that Supreme Court erred in denying their motion for summary judgment dismissing the negligence and strict products liability causes of action in plaintiffs complaint against them, because neither defendant ever manufactured, designed, sold, or distributed the machine in question.
We conclude that defendants did not meet their burden of submitting evidentiary proof in admissible form establishing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. As the moving parties, defendants had to demonstrate that plaintiff had no cause of action (Beasock v DioGuardi Enters., 117 AD2d 1015, 1016). Defendants failed to submit evidence establishing that they were not liable as successor corporations to the Western Gear Corporation. Thus, Supreme Court properly denied their motion for summary judgment. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Houston, J.— Dismiss Causes of Action.) Present—Denman, P. J., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 A.D.2d 991, 600 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-v-bucyrus-erie-co-nyappdiv-1993.