Cameron v. Bouchard

District Court, E.D. Michigan·Decided May 21, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-10949·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMAAL CAMERON, RICHARD BRIGGS, RAJ LEE, MICHAEL CAMERON, and MATTHEW SAUNDERS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, Civil Case No. 20-10949 Honorable Linda V. Parker v.

MICHAEL BOUCHARD, CURTIS D. CHILDS, and OAKLAND COUNTY,

Defendants. ____________________________________/

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the following motions: (i) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 5); (ii) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Class (ECF No. 6); (iii) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 30); (iv) Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Sur-reply (ECF No. 91); and (v) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike (ECF No. 92). The Court held a hearing with respect to the first three motions via videoconference on May 4, 6 and 7, 2020, and entered an Opinion with respect to all of the motions on this date. Pursuant to that Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply (ECF No. 91) is DENIED and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike (ECF No. 92) is DENIED AS MOOT; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (ECF No. 6) is GRANTED and the Court conditionally certifies the

following Class and Subclasses:  “Jail Class”: defined as all current and future Jail detainees during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.

 “Pre-trial Subclass”: defined as all current and future persons detained at the Oakland County Jail during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic who have not yet been convicted of the offense for which they are currently held in the Jail.

 “Post-Conviction Subclass”: defined as all current and future persons detained at the Oakland County Jail during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic who have been sentenced to serve time in the Jail or who are otherwise in the Jail as the result of an offense for which they have already been convicted.

 “Medically-Vulnerable Subclass”: defined as all members of the Jail class who also are over the age of sixty (60) or who, regardless of age, experience any of the following underlying medical conditions: (i) chronic lung disease including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (e.g., bronchitis or emphysema); (ii) moderate to severe asthma; (iii) serious heart conditions; (iv) immunocompromising conditions including cancer treatment, bone marrow or organ transplantation, immune deficiencies, poorly controlled HIV or AIDS, and prolonged use of corticosteroids and other immune weakening medications; (v) severe obesity (body mass index [BMI] of 40 or higher); (vi) diabetes; (vii) chronic kidney or liver disease; (viii) metabolic disorders; or (ix) current or recent (last two weeks) pregnancy. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 30) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART in that it is denied in

all respects, except Defendants Bouchard and Childs are DISMISSED AS PARTIES; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary

Injunction (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED and Defendants shall: 1. Provide each incarcerated person, free of charge, on a bi- weekly basis, two bars of individual hand soap and a hand towel to allow regular hand washing and drying. Provide unrestricted access to additional hand soap upon an inmate’s request.

2. Provide each cell and each dormitory-style housing unit, at no cost, a supply of disinfectant hand wipes or disinfectant products effective against the COVID-19 virus for daily cleanings. Any disinfectant products shall be provided at the manufacturer’s required concentration level and in sufficient quantities for inmates to clean and disinfect the floor and all surfaces of their housing unit.

3. Provide daily access to cleaning supplies at no cost for inmates to clean their cells, including showers, toilets, telephones, and sinks. Supplies shall be disinfected before being shared between housing cells.

4. Require cleaning of any surface or area shared by four (4) or more inmates, for example tabletops, telephones, door handles, television controls, equipment, and restroom fixtures. Surfaces and areas shall be cleaned every hour from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. with bleach-based cleaning agents.

5. Establish a protocol for monitoring and supervising the regular sanitization of housing units, common areas, and surfaces. Provide guidance to correctional staff to provide them with the knowledge needed to oversee and assure that cleaning is adequate and effective. Within five (5) business days of this Order, Defendants shall submit a certified report to the Court identifying the procedures implemented to carry out these directives.

6. Provide access to clean showers and clean laundry, including clean personal towels on a regular basis, but at a minimum on a bi-weekly basis.

7. Provide masks for all inmates and staff members. If cotton masks are provided, such masks must be laundered regularly. Users must be instructed on how to use the mask and the reasons for its use.

8. Require all Jail staff to wear personal protective equipment, including masks and gloves, when interacting with any person, distributing items to prisoners (e.g., mail and hygiene supplies), or when touching surfaces in cells or common areas.

9. Ensure, to the fullest extent possible, that all Jail staff wash their hands with soap and water or use hand sanitizer containing at least 60% alcohol both before and after touching any person or any surface in cells or common areas. Consider allowing staff to carry individual sized bottles of the referenced hand sanitizer while on duty.

10. Maintain a protocol through which an incarcerated person may self-report symptoms of COVID-19 infection and to evaluate those symptoms, including temperature monitoring.

11. Within three (3) business days, provide the Court and Plaintiffs with a detailed plan to continue testing all inmates for COVID- 19, prioritizing members of the Medically-Vulnerable Subclass, as well as a plan to test all individuals who (i) have access to the housing units or (ii) interact with inmates or with individuals who have access to the housing units.

12. Conduct immediate testing for anyone displaying known symptoms of COVID-19 and submit a weekly list to the Court and Plaintiffs’ counsel indicating (i) the number of tests performed that week and (ii) whether any inmates or Jail staff have tested positive for coronavirus.

13. Provide adequate spacing of six feet or more between people incarcerated, to the maximum extent possible, so that social distancing can be accomplished.

14. Ensure that individuals identified as having COVID-19, with symptoms of COVID-19, or having been exposed to COVID-19 receive adequate medical care and are properly quarantined in a non-punitive setting, with continued access to showers, mental health services, reading materials, phone and video calling with loved ones, communications with counsel, and personal property (to the extent reasonable and necessary to the inmate’s physical and mental well-being). Such individuals shall remain in quarantine and wear face masks and gloves when interacting with other individuals until they are no longer at risk of infecting other people. Facemasks must be replaced at medically appropriate intervals.

15. Respond to all COVID-19 related emergencies (as defined by the medical community) within an hour.

16. Post signage and information in common areas that provide: (i) general updates and information about the COVID-19 pandemic; (ii) information on how inmates can protect themselves from contracting COVID-19; and (iii) instructions on how to properly wash hands. Among other locations, all signage must be posted in every housing area and above every sink.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cameron v. Bouchard, (E.D. Mich. 2020).

Cameron v. Bouchard (Cameron v. Bouchard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moltan Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.
55 F.3d 1171 (Sixth Circuit, 1995)
Mapp v. Reno
241 F.3d 221 (Second Circuit, 2001)