Cameron v. Baker, Gieb & Schaub Motors, Inc.
This text of 118 So. 423 (Cameron v. Baker, Gieb & Schaub Motors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On June 4, 1928, appellee filed in this Court his consent to the reversal of the court below upon each *390 and every ground assigned by appellant but without determining the nature or extent of the error assigned; reversal being on the “confession of errors” so entered, consent to said reversal having been given here by appellant through his counsel.
In view of the circumstances so detailed, our conclusion is to reverse the decree of the chancellor upon the “confession of errors” without giving any views as to the extent of the error. The decree will be reversed accordingly and the cause remanded for such proceedings as are consistent with equity practice. Clark v. Caldwell et al., decided April 17, 1928, and cases there cited. Ordered and decreed accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 So. 423, 96 Fla. 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-v-baker-gieb-schaub-motors-inc-fla-1928.