Cameron Thomas Fountain v. State
This text of Cameron Thomas Fountain v. State (Cameron Thomas Fountain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-14-00341-CR NO. 02-14-00342-CR
CAMERON THOMAS FOUNTAIN APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 1322169D, 1322167D
ABATEMENT ORDER
It has come to our attention that appellant's brief has not been filed.
Appellant’s brief was originally due on November 12, 2014. We have notified the
trial court judge and the attorneys of record that appellant's brief has not been
filed, as required by rule 38.8(b). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). Because we have
not received a satisfactory response to our prior notification and in accordance
with rule 38.8(b), we abate the appeal and remand this case to the trial court. FILE COPY
The trial court shall conduct a hearing, with appellant and retained counsel,
Mark D. Scott, present. At the hearing, the court shall make the following
findings on the record:
1. Determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. Determine why retained counsel has not filed a brief and whether counsel has abandoned the appeal;
3. If retained counsel has not abandoned the appeal and, after being informed of the consequences of dismissing the appeal, appellant desires to continue the appeal, determine the exact date that counsel will file a brief on appellant’s behalf in the court of appeals. Inform counsel and appellant that if the brief is not filed on that date, the court of appeals may consider the appeal without briefs. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4);
4. If appellant wants to continue the appeal but counsel has abandoned the appeal, determine whether appellant is indigent and, if so, whether counsel should be appointed to represent appellant and appoint counsel, if necessary;1
5. If appellant desires to proceed pro se, admonish appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation in accordance with Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 2541 (1975) and Hubbard v. State, 739 S.W.2d 341, 345 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987) and determine whether appellant’s decision to proceed pro se is competently and intelligently made; and
6. Take any other measures that the trial court deems necessary to insure appellant does not forfeit his right to appeal.
1If substitute counsel has been appointed to represent appellant, the supplemental record shall reflect that substitute counsel has been notified of the appointment. If appellant is incarcerated, the trial court shall also retain him in the county for a reasonable period of time to allow substitute counsel an opportunity to confer with appellant.
2 FILE COPY
The trial court shall file a record of the hearing in this court on or before
Thursday, January 15, 2015. The record shall include a supplemental
reporter's record and supplemental clerk's record. Upon our receipt of the
supplemental record, the appeal of this cause shall be reinstated automatically
without further order.
The clerk of this court shall transmit a copy of this order to the attorneys of
record, the trial court judge, the trial court clerk, and the court reporter.
DATED December 16, 2014.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cameron Thomas Fountain v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-thomas-fountain-v-state-texapp-2014.