Cameron-Schroth-Cameron Co. v. Geseke

96 N.E. 222, 251 Ill. 402
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 25, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 96 N.E. 222 (Cameron-Schroth-Cameron Co. v. Geseke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cameron-Schroth-Cameron Co. v. Geseke, 96 N.E. 222, 251 Ill. 402 (Ill. 1911).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The constitutionality of section 21 of the Mechanic’s Lien law of 1903, as applied to a subcontractor, where the original contract waives the lien created by the statute or the lien has been released by the original contractor before the lien of the sub-contractor has attached, was fully considered in the case of Kelly v. Johnson, (ante, p. 135,) and it was there held that a sub-contractor’s lien can only exist by virtue of the original contract, and in case the original contract provides there shall be no lien on the improved property for material or labor furnished by the original contractor, or the lien has been subsequently released by the original contractor before a sub-contractor’s lien has attached, such contract or release was binding upon a sub-contractor who had furnished labor or material to the original contractor, arid that as said section of the statute was framed with the view to give a sub-contractor a lien which should not be dependent upon the original contract, it was to that extent unconstitutional and void. That case is conclusive of the case at bar.

The judgment of the municipal court will therefore be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jankoviak v. Butcher
159 N.E.2d 377 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1959)
McNulty v. White
242 Ill. App. 37 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1926)
Herman H. Hettler Lumber Co. v. Hodge
227 Ill. App. 383 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)
Interstate Contracting & Supply Co. v. Belleville Savings Bank
197 Ill. App. 30 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1915)
Rittenhouse & Embree Co. v. William Wrigley, Jr., Co.
264 Ill. 40 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1914)
Dupuis v. Snook
186 Ill. App. 330 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1914)
Stewart v. Talbott
146 P. 771 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 N.E. 222, 251 Ill. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-schroth-cameron-co-v-geseke-ill-1911.