Cameron Mitchell Moore v. State
This text of Cameron Mitchell Moore v. State (Cameron Mitchell Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-19-00372-CR
Cameron Mitchell Moore, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-18-0166, THE HONORABLE WILLIAM R. HENRY, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Cameron Mitchell Moore was charged with aggravated kidnapping, stalking,
attempted capital murder, and two counts of violating a protective order. See Tex. Penal Code
§§ 15.01, 19.03, 20.04, 25.07(g), 42.072. After a trial, Moore was acquitted of aggravated
kidnapping, was acquitted of attempted capital murder but was convicted of the lesser offense
of assault family violence, and was convicted of stalking and of both counts of violating a
protective order. See id. §§ 22.01, 25.07(g), 42.072. Moore was sentenced to ten years’
imprisonment for each offense. See id. § 12.34. Moore appealed the district court’s judgments
of conviction.
Moore’s court-appointed attorney on appeal filed a motion to withdraw supported
by a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 744-45 (1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). After filing the Anders brief, however, Moore’s counsel informed this Court that Moore was
charged with three other felonies that are still pending and that Moore has been declared
incompetent to stand trial in at least one of those cases. Because Moore has been declared
incompetent and will be transferred to a mental-health facility, Moore’s attorney asked this Court
to abate the appeal in order to allow Moore the opportunity to exercise his rights under Anders
(e.g., to review the record and prepare his own pro se brief) after he has regained competency.
We agree with Moore’s attorney’s suggestion. Accordingly, we suspend all
appellate deadlines and abate this appeal until Moore’s attorney notifies this Court that Moore
has been declared competent. See Tex. R. App. P. 2. Upon receiving notice from Moore’s
attorney, this Court will reinstate the appeal, and the applicable 30-day deadline for filing a pro
se brief will start to run from the day of reinstatement. When Moore is declared competent, his
attorney is instructed to resend the previously filed Anders brief along with a letter setting out
Moore’s rights under Anders as well as the new deadline for filing a pro se brief. In the interim,
Moore’s counsel is ordered to file status reports with this Court every 180 days regarding the
status of Moore’s competency.
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Triana
Abated
Filed: January 16, 2020
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cameron Mitchell Moore v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-mitchell-moore-v-state-texapp-2020.