Cameron Estates, Inc. v. Deering

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cameron Estates, Inc. v. Deering

10 A.D.2d 886, 201 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10396

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 886 (Cameron Estates, Inc. v. Deering) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cameron Estates, Inc. v. Deering, 10 A.D.2d 886, 201 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action under article 15 of the Real Property Law to bar claims and remove clouds on title to a tract of land consisting of about 560 acres in Suffolk County, defendants, other than the County of Suffolk, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 23, 1959, denying their motion for a rehearing on additional papers or for reargument of a motion to vacate a judgment on the ground of newly discovered evidence and surprise. Order, insofar as it denies a rehearing on additional papers, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from so much of the order as denies reargument, dismissed, without costs. Such portion of the order is not appealable (Alessi v. Alessi, 6 A D 2d 1044). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action under article 15 of the Real Property Law to bar claims and remove clouds on title to a tract of land consisting of about 560 acres in Suffolk County, defendants, other than the County of Suffolk, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 23, 1959, denying their motion for a rehearing on additional papers or for reargument of a motion to vacate a judgment on the ground of newly discovered evidence and surprise. Order, insofar as it denies a rehearing on additional papers, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from so much of the order as denies reargument, dismissed, without costs. Such portion of the order is not appealable (Alessi v. Alessi, 6 A D 2d 1044). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 886, 201 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-estates-inc-v-deering-nyappdiv-1960.