Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Camero v. State

Camero v. State

123 So. 3d 648, 2013 WL 5476424, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15517
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 2, 2013
DocketNo. 4D13-1790
StatusPublished

This text of 123 So. 3d 648 (Camero v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camero v. State, 123 So. 3d 648, 2013 WL 5476424, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15517 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner alleging appellate counsel was ineffective in prosecuting the appeal in Camero v. State, 103 So.3d 170 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), because all five grounds raised here by petitioner lack merit, rendering counsel’s decision to reject these claims as proper for direct appeal effective assistance. See Barwick v. State, 88 So.3d 85, 108 (Fla.2011); Joseph v. State, 125 So.3d 1020 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Lamb v. McNeil, 41 So.3d 964, 965 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), review denied, 55 So.3d 1287 (Fla.2011).

Petition Denied.

WARNER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lamb v. McNeil
41 So. 3d 964 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Joseph v. State
125 So. 3d 1020 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Barwick v. State
88 So. 3d 85 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 So. 3d 648, 2013 WL 5476424, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camero-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.