Cameras for Industry, Inc. v. I. D. Precision Components Corp.
This text of 30 A.D.2d 526 (Cameras for Industry, Inc. v. I. D. Precision Components Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reducing the amount of the recovery to $91, with interest on said sum from April 22, 1963, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Referee correctly found a breach of contract, but his inclusion of loss of profits in the quantum of damages was in our opinion erroneous. Acceptable proof of a loss of that nature is quite lacking. The pertinent exhibit, apart from being incomplete, failed to meet the requirements of CPLR 4518 (subd. [a]). The underlying books and records from which the exhibit was prepared were not produced, and there was no witness who could testify to the accuracy of the exhibit. Nor were any of plaintiff’s customers called to testify to the placing or canceling of orders. We should add that we must conclude that the alleged facts in any event are insufficient to sustain a claim of the kind asserted. Concur— Botein, P. J., Stevens, Tilzer, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 A.D.2d 526, 290 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameras-for-industry-inc-v-i-d-precision-components-corp-nyappdiv-1968.