Camera v. Long Island University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Camera v. Long Island University

272 A.D.2d 286, 707 N.Y.S.2d 356, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4838

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 286 (Camera v. Long Island University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Camera v. Long Island University, 272 A.D.2d 286, 707 N.Y.S.2d 356, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), dated April 13, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

In opposition to the defendants’ prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Andre v Pomeroy, 35 NY2d 361). Thus, the defendants are entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, S. Miller and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), dated April 13, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

In opposition to the defendants’ prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Andre v Pomeroy, 35 NY2d 361). Thus, the defendants are entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, S. Miller and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 286, 707 N.Y.S.2d 356, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camera-v-long-island-university-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack