Camera Specialty Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Camera Specialty Co. v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 381, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2002

United States Customs Court·Decided April 5, 1965·No. No. 69219; protest 62/17822 (New York)·Published

Opinion

[382]*382Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as “ISOO-MAT ‘LM’ PI. 9/50 mm with exposure meter,” consists of an interchangeable mounted photographic lens and a detachable light meter, each of which is a separate and distinct article, and that the light meter contains a light sensitive unit which is an essential electrical feature, without which the meter will not operate, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[382]*382Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as “ISOO-MAT ‘LM’ PI. 9/50 mm with exposure meter,” consists of an interchangeable mounted photographic lens and a detachable light meter, each of which is a separate and distinct article, and that the light meter contains a light sensitive unit which is an essential electrical feature, without which the meter will not operate, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Camera Specialty Co. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 381, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2002 (cusc 1965).

Pincite

54 Cust. Ct. 381 (Camera Specialty Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.