Camera Specialty Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Camera Specialty Co. v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 381, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2002

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 5, 1965

DocketNo. 69219; protest 62/17822 (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 54 Cust. Ct. 381 (Camera Specialty Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Camera Specialty Co. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 381, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2002 (cusc 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

[382]*382Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as “ISOO-MAT ‘LM’ PI. 9/50 mm with exposure meter,” consists of an interchangeable mounted photographic lens and a detachable light meter, each of which is a separate and distinct article, and that the light meter contains a light sensitive unit which is an essential electrical feature, without which the meter will not operate, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[382]*382Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as “ISOO-MAT ‘LM’ PI. 9/50 mm with exposure meter,” consists of an interchangeable mounted photographic lens and a detachable light meter, each of which is a separate and distinct article, and that the light meter contains a light sensitive unit which is an essential electrical feature, without which the meter will not operate, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 Cust. Ct. 381, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camera-specialty-co-v-united-states-cusc-1965.