Camera Specialty Co. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 386
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Camera Specialty Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Cust. Ct. 144 →
United States Customs Court·Decided May 18, 1959·No. No. 63085; protests 292769-K, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 60940, the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappr.aisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Camera Specialty Co. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 386 (cusc 1959).
42 Cust. Ct. 386 (Camera Specialty Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Time for commencement of action
28 U.S.C. § 2636(d)