Cameo Combined Press, Inc. v. Helfant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cameo Combined Press, Inc. v. Helfant

258 A.D. 980, 17 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8537

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 980 (Cameo Combined Press, Inc. v. Helfant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cameo Combined Press, Inc. v. Helfant, 258 A.D. 980, 17 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8537 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

The respondent was imprisoned for failure to obey an order which directed her to deposit in the Yonkers Savings Bank the sum of $394.64. The assignees of the judgment creditor appeal from a resettled order releasing her from the custody of the sheriff of Westchester county. Resettled order dated September 25, 1939, reversed on the law and tbe facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to renewal. In so far as the application is based on the claim that the respondent is unable to comply with the requirements of the order, the moving papers do not show that she is unable to deposit the sum ordered. Nor do they show that the respondent is unable to endure the punishment. The appeal from the original order is dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur. I

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The respondent was imprisoned for failure to obey an order which directed her to deposit in the Yonkers Savings Bank the sum of $394.64. The assignees of the judgment creditor appeal from a resettled order releasing her from the custody of the sheriff of Westchester county. Resettled order dated September 25, 1939, reversed on the law and tbe facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to renewal. In so far as the application is based on the claim that the respondent is unable to comply with the requirements of the order, the moving papers do not show that she is unable to deposit the sum ordered. Nor do they show that the respondent is unable to endure the punishment. The appeal from the original order is dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur. I

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 980, 17 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameo-combined-press-inc-v-helfant-nyappdiv-1940.