Cameo Associates v. Derderian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cameo Associates v. Derderian

54 A.D.2d 933, 387 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14792

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 933 (Cameo Associates v. Derderian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cameo Associates v. Derderian, 54 A.D.2d 933, 387 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated proceedings to review assessments of certain real property for the tax years 1968/1969 through 1974/1975, the parties cross-appeal from a "counter order and judgment” of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 1, 1975, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, reduced the assessments. "Counter order and judgment” affirmed, without costs or disbursements. After examining the record of the proceedings at Special Term and the evidence submitted by the respective parties, we find that the reductions made in the assessments were proper. We have also considered the objections concerning the admissibility of petitioner’s appraisal and the adequacy of its protests and petitions, and find them to be without merit on the facts herein. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated proceedings to review assessments of certain real property for the tax years 1968/1969 through 1974/1975, the parties cross-appeal from a "counter order and judgment” of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 1, 1975, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, reduced the assessments. "Counter order and judgment” affirmed, without costs or disbursements. After examining the record of the proceedings at Special Term and the evidence submitted by the respective parties, we find that the reductions made in the assessments were proper. We have also considered the objections concerning the admissibility of petitioner’s appraisal and the adequacy of its protests and petitions, and find them to be without merit on the facts herein. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 933, 387 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameo-associates-v-derderian-nyappdiv-1976.