Camelo v. Kelley

89 A.D.3d 1487, 932 N.Y.2d 416
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 2011
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.D.3d 1487 (Camelo v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camelo v. Kelley, 89 A.D.3d 1487, 932 N.Y.2d 416 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Now, upon reading and filing the affirmation of Abbie Goldbas, Attorney for the Child Santino C., dated August 4, 2011 withdrawing said appeal,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal taken by the Attorney for the Child Santino C. is unanimously dismissed and the order is otherwise affirmed without costs. Present — Centra, J.P, Fahey, Peradotto, Bindley and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A.D.3d 1487, 932 N.Y.2d 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camelo-v-kelley-nyappdiv-2011.