CAMELO, KATRINA v. KELLEY, DIANE
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1250 CAF 10-01244 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
IN THE MATTER OF KATRINA CAMELO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
DIANE KELLEY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, AND MARY KELLEY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. -------------------------------------- JOHN G. KOSLOSKY, ESQ., ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD ARIAH C., APPELLANT,
ABBIE GOLDBAS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD SANTINO C., APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
JOHN T. NASCI, ROME, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT MARY KELLEY.
JOHN G. KOSLOSKY, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD ARIAH C., UTICA, APPELLANT PRO SE.
ABBIE GOLDBAS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD SANTINO C., UTICA, APPELLANT PRO SE.
SCOTT T. GODKIN, UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
Appeals from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Brian M. Miga, J.H.O.), entered May 7, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, inter alia, granted sole custody of the subject children to petitioner.
Now, upon reading and filing the affirmation of Abbie Goldbas, Attorney for the Child Santino C., dated August 4, 2011 withdrawing said appeal,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal taken by the Attorney for the Child Santino C. is unanimously dismissed and the order is otherwise affirmed without costs.
Entered: November 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
CAMELO, KATRINA v. KELLEY, DIANE (CAMELO, KATRINA v. KELLEY, DIANE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.