Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Camellon v. State

Camellon v. State

922 So. 2d 228, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20235, 2005 WL 3536099
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 28, 2005
DocketNo. 3D05-714
StatusPublished

This text of 922 So. 2d 228 (Camellon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Camellon v. State, 922 So. 2d 228, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20235, 2005 WL 3536099 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this purported habeas corpus proceeding, Israel Camellón claims that he was denied due process by not having ap[229]*229pellate counsel appointed during an evi-dentiary hearing of a post-conviction relief motion. We observe, however, that not only is Camellon’s petition for writ of ha-beas corpus procedurally barred, the record reflects that no request was made by Camellón for a court appointed counsel for his post-conviction evidentiary hearing, thus the court cannot be said to have abused its discretion by not appointing counsel.1

The petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wheeler v. State
807 So. 2d 94 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
922 So. 2d 228, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20235, 2005 WL 3536099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camellon-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.